ASRock X58 Extreme - $169.99 is not too Extreme
by Gary Key on July 2, 2009 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Test Setup
We selected the ASUS ENGTX260 video card for GPU duties. It is a non-reference design that offers improved thermals and acoustics over the standard NVIDIA GTX260 216 designs. The WD Caviar Black 640GB is our hard drive of choice for storage purposes. LG’s GGC-H20L Blu-ray playback capable drive fills in for optical duties. We utilized Patriot’s DDR3-2000 C8 6GB kit for memory duties. We use 6GB in our standard benchmarks with memory set at DDR3-1600 with 7-8-7-20 1T timings at 1.6V.
We chose the new Corsair Hydro Series H50 CPU cooler for thermal duties and it worked very well in our NZXT Panzerbox. Our standard power supply is the excellent Corsair HX520 and considering our standard test bed is limited to a single video card, this power supply is perfectly suited for us. Finally, we have dropped Vista 64 and moved to Windows7 64-bit RC for our testing today, it just works better.
Overclocking
ASRock considers the X58 Extreme an entry level X58 motherboard with the capability to overclock in a similar fashion to boards costing up to $80 more. They are correct for the most part. There are definitely boards that will hit higher Bclk rates and offer better memory clocking, but we are concentrating on mainstream overclocking abilities in our tests. We focus on the type of overclocks that support 24/7 operation with reasonable cooling alternatives and the ability to run a multitude of programs without a problem. We are not optimizing for Super Pi or 3DMark records.
We put an emphasis on stability during our testing sessions so we test with real world applications ranging from a variety of games to digital imaging software to various audio/video creation programs, along with the typical OCCT and PCMark Vantage tests.
i7 920 D0 6GB Results
Our maximum 24/7 overclock using our cooler selection with the i7 920 D0 resulted in a 4.62GHz clock speed at a respectable 220 Bclk. The 6GB Patriot memory kit is set to DDR3-1760 at 7-8-7-20 1T timings. The primary voltage settings were 1.38V Core VID, 1.41V VTT, 1.85V PLL, 1.65V VDimm, and PCIe at 105MHz. We tried to enable basic power management options (SpeedStep/CState) so idle Core VID voltages could be reduced to the 1.18V range, but we just could not do it and maintain stability at this setting compared to other boards we have tested.
Dropping down to a much easier 24/7 friendly 21x200 (4.2GHz) setting allowed us to run all power management features without a problem at lower voltages. In fact, 21x210 (4.4GHz) was fine also although we had to run the same CPU voltage offset as we did at 4.6GHz. Core Vdroop was approximately -.04V with the Vdroop setting disabled and is our recommended setting. Maximum Bclk that we have reached on the board with standard cooling is 230 (19x230, 4.33GHz) straight from the BIOS, however, memory settings had to be relaxed to 9-9-9-24 at DDR3-1840 for stability. ASRock is continuing to fine tune memory performance on this board, even though the CAS difference does not adversely affect application performance, just the synthetic benchmarks.
i7 920 D0 High Clock Low Volt Results
While overclocking is an important and fun measurement of a board’s capability, we also realize that undervolting can be just as important to others. As such, we devised a quick multitasking test that allows us to push our systems with real world applications that stress the GPU, CPU, Memory, and Storage subsystems. We load up Sony Vegas Pro 9.0 64-bit and set it to transcode a 1080P video while running our FarCry 2 loop benchmark at 1680x1050 2xAA DX10 High Quality in window mode. Average CPU usage is 98% throughout this process with HT enabled.
The ASRock X58 Extreme passed our full test suite at 21x160 for a final 3.37GHz core speed. We enabled the BIOS with full power management options and Core Vid at 1.15V (with offset) resulting in an idle voltage of 0.880V and full load voltage at 1.016V. VTT was set to 1.2V and VDimm at 1.60V with memory timings at 7-8-7-20 1T for DDR3-1600 speeds.
DPC Latency
We receive numerous requests for DPC latency results on each board we test. The ASRock X58 Extreme passed with flying colors using our stock settings at 21x133, but with 12GB of memory at DDR3-1600 with 8-8-8-24 1T timings.
44 Comments
View All Comments
SiliconDoc - Sunday, July 5, 2009 - link
You didn't miss anything because mr sad is sad for his own failed fanning, not for you. Sad for himself, that more people aren't taking bad advice given by the sad crier.I mean where do we get these people ?
You gave the person a fair chance pointing out the plain truth, and there was no rebuttal - not even an attempt.
What is sad, is we all wind up putting up with sad crybabying like that, then when someone like you kindly makes the neccessary points, the other person isn't man, woman, nor adult enough to take correction. They are so screwed up, they come back with a meaningless emotional claim that is a smart aleck lie.
Yeah, that's really, really sad, sick behavior.
I thank you both for the lesson, I now know without a doubt to absolutely avoid the amd board recommendations. That is not sad, I am thankful and happy.
So, just maybe, the skumbagisms that arise so often, are worthwhile.
cube26 - Wednesday, July 8, 2009 - link
+10000 to SiliconDoccube26 - Wednesday, July 8, 2009 - link
+100000snakeoil - Sunday, July 5, 2009 - link
wow, you are charged 1000 dollars for a cpu and you seem to enjoy it , well that its not sad, its pathetic.SiliconDoc - Monday, July 6, 2009 - link
Lying is pathetic, isn't it ?core i7 920 2.66 = $280
top phenom deneb 3.2 = $250
---
the core i7 wins - the lowest end one - roflmao
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock-phen...">http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock-phen...
---
Now that's SAD FOR YOU, and you are now seen as pathetic.
---
better luck next time - try not lying, ok ?
snakeoil - Monday, July 6, 2009 - link
cpu difference between core i7 and phenom ii: 70 dollarsmotherboard difference: 100 dollars
memory difference: 100 dollars
also core i7 is ultra overheating so you add 70 dollars more for a good coolermaster v8 cooler
and you need a case with extragood airflow lets say another 200 dollars.
is that enough for you?
pathetic.
snakeoil - Saturday, July 4, 2009 - link
im not a troll i'm just sad for youSiliconDoc - Monday, July 6, 2009 - link
I've moved your lie to the last page. Reverse bump.SiliconDoc - Sunday, July 5, 2009 - link
Thank you for proving to me the amd boards are crap in comparison, you've done a fine and thorough job of it. Be proud of yourself.A5 - Friday, July 3, 2009 - link
There's no reason to cross-shop Phenom II and i7.