A Preliminary Look at Overclocking Results

Once we were able to overcome our initial difficultly clocking our quad-core QX9650 by manually adjusting the CPU's GTL voltages, we found that the board responded well to our demands for more speed. Our focus was on achieving a balanced, stable overclock at 400MHz FSB, using the highest multiplier that the board's power circuitry and our processor could reasonably handle. In the end we settled on 10x for an even 4GHz - this placed our memory at DDR3-1600 using the 2:1 divider. Although not reported by CPU-Z, our full-load CPU voltage at this speed was about 1.28V and the X48 Platinum had no issues supplying the necessary current in a stable fashion.



Our memory timings ended up being a little looser than we would have liked. After 2.00V the board's next higher memory voltage setting was 2.17V, a little more than we were willing to give our expensive DDR3 memory simply for the purpose of setting CAS 6 instead of CAS 7. We have already discussed with MSI the need for finer fidelity when setting a DRAM voltage above 2V.



Memory read performance is certainly on par with what we expect for our settings. We are able to determine that tRD is being set to 7 by the board at an FSB of 400MHz, two whole clicks looser than we would have liked when it comes to X48. This along with setting 1N would help the memory read performance to easily eclipse 10GB/s. Write speeds are also a little low; later we were able to determine that the write recovery time (tWR) we set in BIOS at 10 clocks was being ignored and the board was defaulting to 21T. Rest assured minor problems like these will be corrected before a shipping BIOS is released.



Adding options for tRD (MCH Read Delay) and a couple other key memory timings will go a long way improving the already good memory latency time. It should be possible with a little tuning to take this number below 50ns. This is where Intel systems start to feel truly fast. We look forward to working closely with MSI in making this possible.

Today's results are not intended as anything more than an early look at how MSI's X48 offering is shaping up on the clocking front. In early application testing, the board performs on par with current X38/X48 DDR3 offerings.  In fact, at this point there are not any real performance differences between the P35/X38/X48/680i/780i boards at stock speeds.  Any differences we have noticed come down to memory sub-timing settings and resulting performance increases that show up in benchmarks.  For the most part, buyers in this market segment are usually more concerned about features and overclocking abilities rather that Office 2007 performance.
That said, we will report complete testing results in our upcoming X38/X48/780i motherboard round-up, which will be available right before Intel's official chipset launch in the latter part of February. We will bring you all the information needed in order to decide just which platform deserves your hard earned money.
Interesting and Unusual BIOS Settings Initial Thoughts
Comments Locked

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • Orthogonal - Thursday, January 31, 2008 - link

    [quote]Adding options for tRD (MCH Read Delay) and a couple other key memory timings will go a long way improving the already good memory latency time.[/quote]

    I would hope that everyone in the industry read your article on the Asus X48 board with adjustable tRD to realize how important this will be to the enthusiast community. If you keep pushing, I imagine most of them will capitulate

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now