Media Performance

We will take a brief look at general media performance with our test suite that includes Adobe Photoshop CS2 and Adobe Photoshop Elements 5.0. We utilize the PC WorldBench 6.0 Test for measuring platform performance in Adobe's Photoshop CS2. The benchmark applies an extensive number of filters to the test image and heavily stresses the CPU and storage systems. The scores include the full conversion process reported in seconds, with lower numbers indicating better performance.


Media
Performance - Adobe Photoshop CS2

Our next test is one recommended by Intel, but the test itself appears to be fair and results are very repeatable. This test simply measures the amount of time required to fix and optimize 103 different photos weighing in at 63MB. We measure time in seconds, with lower times resulting in better performance.


Media
Performance - Photoshop Elements 5.0

Media Encoding Performance

We are utilizing Nero Recode 2 for our video encoding test. The scores reported include the full encoding process and are in seconds, with lower numbers indicating better performance.


Media
Encoding Performance - Nero Recode 2

Audio Encoding Performance

We will utilize iTunes 7.4 for our audio encoding tests, as it is one of the most utilized audio applications available due to the immense popularity of the iPod. As in previous articles, we are using an INXS Greatest Hits CD for testing, which contains 16 tracks totaling 606MB of songs. We use iTunes to convert our WAV files into an ACC compatible format. We utilize the 256kbps and variable bit rate option.


Audio
Encoding Performance - iTunes 7.4

File Compression Performance

Another CPU crunching utility is WinRAR 3.70, which provides for computationally intensive file compression. Our test folder contains 444 files, 10 subfolders, and 602MB worth of data. The WinRAR test utilizes default settings and we defragments the hard drive before each test


File
Compression Performance - WinRAR 3.70

Performance Summary

Yet again, the ASUS Maximus Extreme performs well in tests that do not depend on fast CPU/memory throughput. The latency/throughput penalty with DDR3 running at 1066 speeds does come into play in our Photoshop Elements and WinRAR tests. However, the overall differences between the boards are minimal.

Futuremark Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • retrospooty - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    Wireless works yes. They are linked up through the base and work in dos mode. Both RF, and bluetooth meese work.
  • kilkennycat - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    I notice from the board picture that the rear mounting holes are still in the corners of the board, so if the WIDTH is 4cm more than the standard ATX, does the board need special mounting ? I assume that WIDTH means the distance across the edge of the board in contact with the rear of the case. Please correct if my assumption is wrong.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    THe width is the length across the top edge of the board. Screw hole spacing is still standard ATX, just that this board over-hangs by a few cm (the Sata port end will protrude further into your case) ...

    regards
    Raja
  • kilkennycat - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    As yes, you actually mean DEPTH of course, if referencing tower case dimensions (Height x Width x Depth). So any case wishing to accommodate this board needs to have at least 4cm DEEPER front to rear clearance for the motherboard, nothing to do with it being a mid-tower or full-tower. Am I right?

    Might also preclude using this MB in those cases having the motherboard mounted on a slide-in ATX tray ( a great feature, btw ), as they may have a lip or other registration hardware on the leading-edge of the tray.
  • retrospooty - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    What size are they? I cant find it here, or on Asus's site. They look like 1/4 inch - which kind of sucks.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    The fittings are 1/4", but ASUS does provide adapetrs to use 1/2 tubing..

    Raja..

  • retrospooty - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    thanks... bummer. 1/4 restricts my flow.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now