DDR2 Roundup: Reaching for 667 and Beyond
by Wesley Fink on July 8, 2004 12:09 AM EST- Posted in
- Memory
OCZ Premier PC2 4300
OCZ is a well-known supplier of Enthusiast DDR memory. However, OCZ is still working on their performance versions of DDR2. We expect to receive a DDR2 667 version in the next couple of days that is presumably based on the same high-performing Micron chips that topped these performance tests.For this roundup, OCZ supplied their Premier PC2-4300. The Premier line is OCZ's budget memory, comparable to value lines from other manufacturers.
Test DIMMs were a matched pair of single-sided 512MB DDR2 DIMMs with copper-colored heatspreaders.
The memory chips are Samsung high-density, and OCZ also provided a pair of 1GB DIMMs for testing. We did not include the 1GB OCZ PC2 4300 DIMMs in this review because we were told recently that the production version of the 1GB DIMM would use different memory chips. We saw no point in including DIMMs that would not be representative of the retail OCZ product.
Test Results: OCZ Premier PC2 4300
The full suite of benchmark tests were run at all memory speeds. This includes Quake3, Super PI, Sandra 2004 SP2 Memory Tests, Aida 32 Memory Tests, and Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory. We also ran UT2003, Aquamark 3, and Comanche 4 at every memory speed to verify stability of the reported memory timings. All benchmarks and additional tests had to complete without incident for the memory settings to be considered stable.OCZ Premier PC2 4300 (DDR2 533) - 2 x 512Mb Single-Bank | |||||
Speed | Memory Timings & Voltage | Quake3 fps | Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered | Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
533DDR 800FSB |
3-3-3-10 1.85V |
370.5 | INT 3001 FLT 3030 |
INT 4897 FLT 4897 |
107 |
667DDR 1000FSB |
4-4-4-10 1.9V |
454.1 | INT 3457 FLT 3546 |
INT 6089 FLT 6084 |
86 |
686DDR 258FSB |
4-4-4-10 1.9V |
468.0 | INT 3593 FLT 3655 |
INT 6266 FLT 6274 |
84 |
OCZ Premier PC2 4300 (DDR2 533) | ||||
Speed | RCW-ET Radar |
Aida 32 Read |
Aida 32 Write |
Aida 32 Total |
533DDR 800FSB |
78.4 | 5409 | 2081 | 7490 |
667DDR 1000FSB |
96.9 | 6572 | 2575 | 9147 |
686DDR 258FSB |
99.8 | 6743 | 2664 | 9407 |
Since the Samsung chips were some of the first working DDR2 produced by the memory manufacturers, we are not surprised to find average performance in the OCZ PC2 4300 results. Having said that, it is important to note that even the older Samsung chips manage DDR2 533 performance at 3-3-3 timings and at 1.85V, and DDR2 667 and 686 at 4-4-4 and a modest 1.9V.
20 Comments
View All Comments
Wesley Fink - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
#9 - Actually the first number was copied incorrectly and has now been fixed. The tRas 11 line on p.3 now reads 5303-2344-7647.FlameDeer - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Hi Wesley, nice article. :)Something to change:
At page 3, Micron PC2-4300U Table, Row tRAS 11,
Aida 32 Total should be "7697".
MIDIman - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
> When can we expect DDR2 for A64?http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
mczak - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Nice article, a real pity though there are no performance numbers for overclocked FSB only (i.e. FSB 258 / DDR2-"516"). There are some reasons to believe memory performance would also be quite a bit higher than with FSB200/DDR2-533...Bozo Galora - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
Another clear concise mem article by Prometheus.KillaKilla - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
When can we expect DDR2 for A64? Even thouthe they aren't so affected by lack of memory bandwidth...rjm55 - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
I am not usually that much into memory articles, but this is one of the best reviews I have seen on the new Intel architecture. It was surprising that even the budget DDR2 did 667. When will Intel be launching 667 as an "official" DDR2 speed?Anemone - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
VERY nice article - and informative on the limits that no one else is authoritatively reviewing. Thankyou and keep them coming!:)
skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
or... im blind..skiboysteve - Thursday, July 8, 2004 - link
you should mention in the benchmarks which modules are DS and SS, so people dont go ape shit over poor performance of say... GEIL..